User Ratings

★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
3
3
1
1
0
ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 3 / 5
features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 5 / 5

Rate This Project

Login To Rate This Project

User Reviews

  • 高清看男人插曲女人视频 Just as another review mentioned, no actual program download fromo SourceForge, the [Download] button only yields a small "lexer" zip file. So at this point no idea what the software actually does and therefor even just two stars is already a stretch. And then folks wonder why Open Source software isn't making any inroads...

    1 user found this review helpful.

    Reply from CudaText

    Posted 2019-03-06
    Just added a NOTE to SF.net description field, that actual app files are at UVviewsoft.com. SF hosts only add-ons packages.
  • This is a classic example of "We don't need no stinkin' documentation!" There is nothing telling you how to install it. The files available here on SF are useless and you actually have to go to github to find anything. Once you get there, there is no documentation. It may be the most wonderful editor in existence, but I'll never know because I gave up on it when, after finally manually copying it to my "\Program Files" directory, it crashed because it wanted to write files back into the installation directory. Since this is a hard NO-NO in Windows (and should be anywhere else), I've deleted everything about it. My 3-star rating is simply recognition that there may be a decent app hidden under all these problems.

    2 users found this review helpful.

    Reply from CudaText

    Edited 2019-03-06
    I hoped that all users can see doc-WIKI links at the homepage UVviewsoft.com ? Seems no. Ok, added link to WIKI here at SF.net. Added link to homepage at SF.net. It is portable app for Windows so you must unpack zip file to any folder out of Program Files and run the EXE file. You must not use portable app in the Program Files folder. Only installers must copy files there.
  • 高清看男人插曲女人视频 Very promising text editor. I will observe how this project is being developed.

    1 user found this review helpful.
  • CudaText is developing quickly, the developers are very active and also very responsive on the official forum. As CudaText is written in Object Pascal on Lazarus, they were able to provide official builds for Linux, macOS, Windows and FreeBSD that are all using native OS APIs but retain the same appearance on every system. CudaText is a very promising project and piece of software.

    2 users found this review helpful.
  • 高清看男人插曲女人视频 Really lightweight, and for this very small size, it can do great things. The plug-in mechanisms work perfectly; you can start coding right away. I'm starting to use it daily.

    1 user found this review helpful.
  • Seems to be like poor mans sublime text, cheaper in money (100%) and ram usage (~38%). Surprisingly capable for such small and light program. I wish I could find the gtk3 version... Sublime handles quoting text a bit smarter and has better go-anywhere keybindings, but other than that, cuda seems just as good and in some areas even better alternative. Excellent editor just a bit short of perfect

    2 users found this review helpful.
  • An excellent text editor to use for everyday work. It has most of the features needed to work with source code, and has a large number of plugins. Light-weight, does not have too many dependencies, and starts up quickly. It is also cross-platform - even has Linux-ARM support.

    1 user found this review helpful.
  • 高清看男人插曲女人视频 I use CudaText instead of Sublime or Notepad++. CudaText is fast, stable and easy to use. It has Themes, Plugins, Code completion, Project Tree and more.

    1 user found this review helpful.